Natural Code

Code, science and politics.

Sixty-nine fascists : there’s still one place where the majority will defend Bush.

Tuesday night on Countdown, Rachel Maddow talked to Jonathan Turley, professor of constitutional law. The professor had this to say about the Democrats’ capitulation on the FISA bill :

“So, what the Democrats are doing here with the White House is they‘re trying to conceal a crime that is hiding in plain view, that everyone can see it.  And so, the argument for it is quite sill simple, nobody wants to have a confrontation over the fact that the president committed a felony, not once, but at least 30 times.  That‘s a very inconvenient fact right now in Washington.”

“I think that the founders would have found this incomprehensible.  The expanse of power to the point of including what is now defined as a federal crime.  And not only that, but the Democrats have learned well from Bush.

Because the telecoms are losing in court, because the administration is losing in court, they‘re just going to change the rules, so that these public interest organizations that have brought these cases will all lose by a vote to fiat by the Democrats.  It‘s otherworldly.”

MADDOW:  “Senator Obama says he does not like this bill, but he says he‘s supporting it as a compromise.  Is this a compromise?  Is that the right term for it?  Is he right?”

TURLEY:  “Yes.  I got to tell you, I am completely astonished by Senator Obama‘s position and obviously disappointed.  You know, all of these senators need to respect us enough, not to call it a compromise.  It‘s a cave-in.”

TURLEY:  “And, you know what‘s terrible is like one of those stories where someone is assaulted on a street and a hundred witnesses do nothing.  And in this case, the Fourth Amendment is going to be eviscerated tomorrow.  And 100 people are going to watch it happen because it‘s just not their problem.

But you talk about expanding the president‘s power, it‘s coming out of the marrow of the Fourth Amendment.  It‘s coming out of the bone.  And it‘s going to hurt.  And it‘s being done for political convenience.  There‘s not an ounce of principle, not an ounce of public interest in this legislation.

So, at least show us respect of not calling it a compromise.”

Amen. Calling it a compromise is an insult to Americans on top of the injury to the Constitution. Yesterday was a terrible day for freedom and justice, and the cowards that let this happen in a Democrat-controlled Senate need to be called out.

One more reason to use encryption wherever we can. If only Tor was faster.

July 10, 2008 - Posted by naturalcode | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

3 Comments »

  1. This is on of the architects of the FISA bill:

    http://stuffwhitedbagslike.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/dictionary-of-national-d-bags-john-yoo/

    To understand what kind of mind would let this happen, read the rest of the blog.

    Comment by chunque | July 10, 2008 | Reply

  2. I’m sorry, but Bush & Republican’s break the law, yet Democrats bear more responsibility because they do not act on it? This is the equivalent of blaming the cop who did not catch the killer, when it is the entire fault of the murderer not the cop!

    As far as a “Democratically Controlled Senate” maybe you have not checked the math lately, but there are 49 Dems, 49 Repubs, 1 Independent and 1 Lieberman, making the Senate for all practical purposes controlled by no party, let alone achieving a 2/3rds vote to overturn a Presidential Veto.

    Continue to eat your young, then don’t complain when the vile taste sticks in your mouth for years to come.

    It’s funny you mention Turley as I watched it as well, then maybe you should read his counterpart on that same episode, John Dean’s book, “Conservatives without Conscious” to understand what the implications of your attack have in the long run, instead of this very short sighted view.

    Comment by Hans | July 10, 2008 | Reply

  3. I’m not a Democrat. You’ll appreciate, then, that this talk of me helping my party self-destruct rings a little hollow.

    The Democrats who let this happen are cowards. They didn’t commit the crime, but they allowed it to happen because it was the easiest thing to do.

    These guys are like a cop who witnesses a murder, watches the murderer walk away because he really wants to finish his cigarette, and then pretends he was never there and refuses to testify against the murderer because that would raise unpleasant questions and he just wants to go home and watch CSI.

    Don’t get me wrong, cowardly Democrats are not nearly as bad as lying, stealing, murdering Republicans. Crooked cops shouldn’t get a free pass on the grounds that they’re not as violent as the criminals, though.

    Comment by naturalcode | July 10, 2008 | Reply


Leave a comment